Foods to avoid high cholesterol | Why having high cholesterol isn’t always bad

Why having high cholesterol isn’t always bad


High cholesterol is bad, right? Not always! In this week’s UltraWellness blog, Dr. Mark Hyman explains the surprising truth about cholesterol and tells you which tests you really need to determine your risk of heart disease. For more, see www.ultrawellness.com

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Filed Under Cholesterol Chart | 25 Comments

Tagged With , , , ,

Comments

25 Responses to “Why having high cholesterol isn’t always bad”

  1. redthor60 on August 3rd, 2010 8:27 pm

    My friend drinks this juice & it helped bring down his cholesterol by 100 points in less than 90 days! How amazing is that?
    Go to juiceberg’s channel & they’ll hook you up!

  2. kwrbassist on August 3rd, 2010 8:31 pm

    @victor2cutube you’re damn right about that

  3. dolphina05 on August 3rd, 2010 8:48 pm

    For my supplements I use iherb.com. They have very good price, fast shipping, great service. Use promo code ZAY467 on first order to get $5 off.

  4. MIKEH75 on August 3rd, 2010 8:55 pm

    use code DIS119 to get a? very special vitamin discount at iherb? too!

  5. marek0086 on August 3rd, 2010 9:21 pm

    Mark Hyman FTW!!!

  6. marek0086 on August 3rd, 2010 10:00 pm

    Ye man theres some really brain dead “Physicians” out there. Do your own research and you’ll end up knowing more than a GP on a specific topic.

  7. halavey on August 3rd, 2010 10:12 pm

    Mine is over 270 and my HDL is only 40 My trygl is 290–very high and i am fine at 69 not a big drinker, quit smoking many years ago my dad has close to the same thing and is now 99 years old and healthy, no drugs and I do not take a thing because I get pains in my stomach from the pills, all of them. My Mom’s side all died young with low cholesterol, heart attacks for the men in their 40′s and 50′s so I don’t by the drug drug theory, they seem to be hard on the body even if they lower it.

  8. agustinromanii on August 3rd, 2010 10:34 pm

    theres no such thing as “good” and “bad” cholesterol, LDL and HDL are lipo PROTEINS, thats transfer cholesterol from point A to point B and vice versa. Sugar causes inflammatory responses in your arteries and cause LDL to transport cholesterol from your liver to the artery. If you avoid cholesterol and animal fats from your diet, LDL and cholesterol will get oxidized and build up as plaque in your arteries.

  9. bohemenmann on August 3rd, 2010 10:55 pm

    Good info! The truth!

  10. VeoKenKs on August 3rd, 2010 10:57 pm

    i agree 100% with what you said :)

    except for one thing where you said saturated fats were bad but saturated animal fats are good and healthy

  11. atreewithnolife on August 3rd, 2010 11:48 pm

    thank you so much this makes sense I was gonna start wiyth Lipex but hearing so much bad reports was scared to , mine is 6.7 whatever that means? anyway Im not gonna take it ! diet excercise !

  12. trento654 on August 3rd, 2010 11:52 pm

    that’s exacly what i ment, how long you have to live isn’t really a factor if you have slighly high cholesterol, as long as you keep it under control you should be fine but this doctor was just pushing drugs on me even though i’m healthy in every other way

    he said he’d get back to us with further arangements, his clinic wasen’t that big or busy, in fact it was pretty run down

  13. ronjer1 on August 4th, 2010 12:27 am

    he doesn’t need to call you back. There are tons of people breaking down his door in order to get cholesterol lowering medication because the media told them so. Do you need to do that?

    My grandparents both had cholesterol numbers in the high 400′s and both lived over 90, and one is 99 right now. What does cholesterol have to do with this? I don’t know if I will ever live that long, not because of cholesterol, but because of this b-i-t-c-h called “life”.

  14. trento654 on August 4th, 2010 12:54 am

    that’s australian mesurement btw

  15. trento654 on August 4th, 2010 1:00 am

    i have heditary high cholesteral and some quack specialist told me i wouldn’t live to 21 with a cholestrol level of 8 if i didn’t go on medication,” if you go on medication, you’ll live a normal life”. he didn’t even call back to arrage further appointments after my blood test

  16. quitejaded on August 4th, 2010 1:48 am

    Can someone help me? I love to eat proteins. I eat 2-3 eggs almost every day and I usually have some broiled/stewed chicken for dinner. For lunch, I usually have whatever is laying around (which is bad, I know :( but I hate cooking the night before and refridgerating food then popping it in the microwave. I dunno…)

  17. 7410n0 on August 4th, 2010 2:27 am

    It takes time to build up all the evidence for a theory. After the publishing of Darwin’s On Origin of Speices, it took us almost a century to come up with the modern evolutionary synthesis.

  18. 7410n0 on August 4th, 2010 2:46 am

    Peer review doesn’t count?

  19. 7410n0 on August 4th, 2010 2:57 am

    “This is why scientists call medicine a RELIGION.”

    I have NEVER heard a scientist call medicine a religion. You got a source for that?

  20. victor2cutube on August 4th, 2010 3:51 am

    it’s all about the money

  21. litebug12345 on August 4th, 2010 4:16 am

    I worry alot about the potential side effects of “big pharma” prescription drugs, I have always gravitated toward a natural alternative. For the longest time I had no idea that such an alternative even existed for cholesterol! I thought Rx was the only choice. Sterolyn is brilliant no side effects at all for me. I really appreciate this product.

  22. fatfist on August 4th, 2010 4:47 am

    A rational and logical thought process must be used in order to determine if people’s claims are THE truth. Truth is ascertained by a systemic process, not by somebody’s opinion, or how many journals they wrote.
    So you see, facts and truths are not relative to a study or a journal; they are NOT relative at all. They are ascertained from a systemic process of resolution.

  23. fatfist on August 4th, 2010 5:45 am

    If the cholesterol medical hype was based on the scientific method, then evidence, facts, and truths, would be used to develop what would be called a Theory of Cholesterol & Heart Disease. This theory, as all scientific theories, would be able to explain existing known facts and be able to produce TRUTH statements. This doesn’t necessarily mean it would provide proof for all domains; but it does mean that we would definitely have at least 1 truth statement!!

  24. fatfist on August 4th, 2010 6:33 am

    All those journals the littlemunchkin was yapping about are available via online subscriptions. It’s medical research sponsored by big pharma; nothing else. Conclusions are drawn on studies based on probability, statistics, and very crude approximations. Hence, there is NO TRUTH, or FACT, or PROOF. There is only BELIEF. This is why scientists call medicine a RELIGION. This is what the medical community doesn’t want you to know. Medicine has very little to do with the scientific method.

  25. fatfist on August 4th, 2010 6:37 am

    Well this is the issue of today’s evidence-based medicine, where we only see the evidence the big pharma companies want us to see. People are clueless to this fact and have belief in what they are wrongly led to accept as TRUTH. But it’s nowhere near truth; let alone proof of anything. Medical research is NOT science; it’s big pharma research to figure out how to treat symptoms with drugs. It’s NEVER about understanding the root cause.

Leave a Reply




Powered by Yahoo! Answers